NATO and French plans to topple Gaddafi have been on track since last November 2010....

At http://fbechis.blogspot.com/ there is an article entitled "Sarkozy declared war on Italy"

"Ma quale Gheddafi! Sarkò ha dichiarato guerra all'Italia"

According to this article:

For three years French President Nicolas Sarkozy was extremely keen to sell to Libya:

(1) an entire fleet of Dassault fighter aircraft ....and the famous Rafale....

(2) nuclear plants in and around Tripoli.

These sales were discussed by Sarkozy and Gaddafi in December 2007 in Paris.

As it turned out, Gaddafi bought very little from France....

http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_12777

Gaddafi bought from Russia and Italy.

Sarkozy frothed with rage.

Now France is bombing Libya.

France is bombing the planes Gaddafi bought from Russia.



On 25 March 2011, at http://www.voltairenet.org/en we learn that French plans to topple Gaddafi have been on track since last November

From this we learn:

According to Italian journalist Franco Bechis, plans to spark the Benghazi rebellion were initiated by the French intelligence services in November 2010.

This revelation has the blessing of the Italian secret services.

Timeline of events

October 6, 2010

Former Gaddafi supporter Nouri Mesmari, working with the French secret service, is to mastermind the revolution against Gaddafi.

Documents on this have been leaked to the Italian newspaper Libero.

Mesmari gives the French much information about the Gaddafi regime.

October 20, 2010

Mesmari, under the protection of French secret services, heads to France.

He has several top secret meetings with secret service agents and other top people close to Nicolas Sarkozy.

November 18, 2010

A French ‘commercial’ delegation leaves for Benghazi.

In the delegation there are officials from the Ministry of Agriculture and representatives from Cam Cereals, France Export Cereals, Cargill, Glencore, France Agrimer, Soufflet, Louis Dreyfus, and Comagra.

Among the delegation, posing as government officials, there are French secret service agents and military staff.

Their 'business' is meeting army officers ready to defect from the Libyan army.

While in Benghazi, contact is made with Libyan air defense colonel, Abdallah Gehani.

USA plane in Libya... Secrecy surrounds pilot and weapons officer in F-15 crash

November 28, 2010

An international warrant of arrest is issued by the Libyan government for Nouri Mesrami.

Foreign Minister Musa Koussa is held responsible for the defection of Mesrami and his passport is withdrawn by the authorities.

December 2, 2010

Muammar Gaddafi sends messages to Nouri Mesrami to win him back saying that he forgives him for what he did and invites him back to Libya.

December 23, 2010

A delegation of Libyans arrives in Paris for meetings with Mesrami and other French officials.

The Libyans are Ali Ounes Mansouri, Farj Charrant and Fathi Boukhris.

These three men will be known later, together with Ali Hajj, as leaders of the revolution, that started from Benghazi.

The Libyan delegation together with Mesrami and French military and secret service personnel dine at an elegant French restaurant at the Champs Elisée.

December 25 – 31, 2010

" The situation in Benghazi is boiling".

January 22, 2011

Protests turn into clashes and army officials desert.

The rebels capture important cities.

The French government is the first European state to recognize the new Libyan National Council and establish diplomatic relations.

~~

Sarkozy and Gaddafi were keen on doing military deals worth billions of Euros, before they fell out, according to the Telegraph

'Libya funded Sarkozy's election campaign'


On 25 March 2011, The Guardian has an article entitled: Libya remembers, we forget: these bombs are not the first

From this we learn:

"The world's first aerial bombing campaign took place in Libya ... in September 1911."

The Italians bombed Libya, hoping to make it part of their empire.

The Italians carried out "the deliberate destruction of villages, wells and herds with force.

"Nearly 100,000 people were interned or deported, and thousands died of disease or malnutrition in labor camps.

"Italian planes ... dropped mustard gas in defiance of the 1925 Geneva protocol...

"The Italians ... devastated the old pastoral economy, and depopulated much of the land..."

After World War II, Libya's new British-backed king, Idris was eventually replaced by Colonel Gaddafi.

"Gaddafi ordered British and American air bases to close and kicked out the 20,000 Italians still living in the country, nationalizing their property...

"Two years after forcing the Italians to leave, the socialist Gaddafi was inviting Italian corporations back in, turning the former colonial oppressor into Libya's chief European business partner...

"The Libyans ... will remember what we have forgotten – that these planes are not the first..."

Not for the first time have the "rats" in Paris done back-stabbing: Laurent Fabius was happy to take Ceausescu's money in 1981 for the Mitterrand campaign then plotted with Ion Ilescu in summer 1989....

Just ahead of two Libyan jets which landed in Malta on Monday February 21 were two large French helicopters which arrived,apparently, from Libya. The two copters carried seven people who told the authorities that they were French but only one had a passport.
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/africa/110222/libya-malta-muammar-gaddafi

Pictures of the helicopters here,plus the jets, and fascinating discussion on all pages either side...
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?194497-2-Libyan-Mirage-Fighters-defect-to-Malta/page3

Re the defecting jets and pilots, everything has gone very quiet
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110305/local/fears-over-safety-of-defecting-military-pilots-families-in-libya

"It's very very confidential" according to Mr Friggieri (re asylum applications)
Last news March 10th.

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110310/local/granting-libyan-pilots-asylum-would-send-strong-message

http://www.blockreportradio.com/radio-mainmenu-27/1065-an-pan-african-view-on-libya-and-qadafi.html

Dawn of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Tunisia, KSA, "Syria soon enough..."

Website for this image

....Dawn of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Tunisia, KSA, "Syria soon enough..." and elsewhere....CIA tactics and methods....

"An ex-CIA agent and counter-intelligence expert has revealed in a special report that Barack Obama has quietly appointed individuals who are friendly to radical Islam to key posts within the Administration." (Report - Obama quietly appoints Muslim Brotherhood to key posts.)

On 19 March 2011, Egyptians vote in a referendum on changes to the constitution.

On 17 March 2011, we read that, the constitutional changes will help the Muslim Brotherhood

According to the Financial Times: "The Muslim Brotherhood ... looks poised to emerge as the main beneficiary of new political arrangements to be put in place by Egypt's transitional military authorities."

Egypt's CIA-controlled generals seem to have decided to side with the CIA-controlled Muslim Brotherhood against the 'youth-led secular groups'.

"Some analysts and political activists said the Supreme Military Council ... may have decided that an alliance of conservative forces presents a better option for the future than that offered by the young secular groups." (the constitutional changes will help the Muslim Brotherhood)

Hossam Tammam, an analyst who specializes in Islamist groups, says "There are signs the military may have decided to bet on the Brotherhood as the biggest organized force on the street.

"The others (small parties and secular groups) may be seen by the army as representing an unwanted and radical transition to democracy." (the constitutional changes will help the Muslim Brotherhood)

The Muslim Brotherhood and Mubarak's National Democratic party "look set to dominate the next parliament." (the constitutional changes will help the Muslim Brotherhood)

The Brotherhood "is the only political group to have been represented on the panel of legal experts handpicked by the military that drafted the constitutional changes." (the constitutional changes will help the Muslim Brotherhood)

Eisenhower in the Oval Office with members of Muslim Brotherhood (What Is the Muslim Brotherhood, and Will It Take Over Egypt ...)

Remember Iran, and compare the Shah with Mubarak.

According to this article: "The British, the Middle East and Radical Islam - Red Moon Rising":

"Prior to the British-sponsored massive public relations campaign on behalf of the Ayatollah, the government of the Shah was despised by the vast majority of the Iranian population...

"The Shah began to push forward a number of nationalist policies that increased his megalomania at home and abroad....but, in some cases, worried the Anglo-American Establishment because of the savagery of SAVAK/MOSSAD tactics for decades.....

"First, he signed petroleum agreements with ENI, the Italian oil company.

"Then in 1963 he pushed forward on a series of popular reforms that became known as the White Revolution.

"The Shah evolved into a nationalist whose path paralleled that of Nasser far too much for the Establishment's liking:

"He bought land from the upper classes and, along with the crown's own land, sold it back cheaply to tenant farmers, allowing over one a half million people to become land owners and ending the old feudal system.

"He allowed women the right to vote, and brought an end to the wearing of the veil, which were 'Westernizing' moves unwelcomed by the religious sector.

"He pushed forward on a $90 billion nuclear power program.

"He moved to shut down the lucrative opium industry that had been created during the days of British Empire control that had been running for a hundred years.

"The attack on the Shah's government came through the Muslim Brotherhood and through the mullahs and ayatollahs of Iran, supported and manipulated by CIA and British Intelligence..."

Radio Free Iran reportedly claimed that while at Qom Khomeini received a "monthly stipend from the British, and he is in constant contact with his masters, CIA and MI6...."

Notes http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/BritIslam.htm


It would seem that the US and NATO prefer Moslem governments to be fundamentalist because fundamentalists are easier to control....

“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to the God”

“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to the God”....

With Hosni Mubarak’s ouster in Egypt – widely considered to have one of the region’s most stable regimes until only recently – and Colonel Muammar Qaddafi clinging to power in Libya, there is no clear end in sight to the turmoil sweeping across the Arab world. Protests have already toppled governments in Tunisia and Egypt, leaving other Arab countries faced with widespread discontent.

The unrest caught most people by surprise – both inside and outside the region – and has fundamentally upended at least five conventional beliefs about the Arab world.

Arabs don’t go into the street. Before the protests began in Egypt and Tunisia, many people argued that there was no real urgency to political reform, and that those who were calling for change did not understand the public mood – things weren’t as bad as the dissidents made them out to be. This line of thinking led governments to believe that Arabs would not demonstrate in large numbers and demand change. In each country, rapid reform was seen as detrimental to national interests.

This argument clearly is no longer tenable. No one predicted what happened in Egypt and Tunisia, which means that no Arab country is immune. Governments don’t have the luxury of waiting forever, and they can no longer use the myth of popular quiescence to avoid initiating the necessary reforms that will address the public’s underlying grievances.

Economic liberalization should precede political reform. Arab governments – and many Westerners – claimed that privatization and other economic reforms should be given priority over political change. But, while it is easy to argue that citizens want bread before freedom, economic liberalization came without a system of checks and balances, and thus largely resulted in neither bread nor freedom.

Instead, the benefits of privatization and other initiatives went largely to political and business elites. As a result, Arabs have come to view liberalization and globalization negatively. It is clear by now that economic reform must be coupled with political reform, so that institutional mechanisms of accountability are developed to monitor any excesses and ensure that benefits are made available to all. Governments have been quick to believe that the protests are fundamentally about high prices and unemployment, but the issue that unites Arab discontent is inadequate governance.

Closed systems are necessary to prevent Islamists from taking power. The West is often afraid that democracy will give Islamists the opening they need to gain control – a fear that Arab regimes exploit to justify maintaining closed political systems. But Islamists did not play a big role in Egypt or Tunisia, and they are not expected to lead any of the new governments that are formed – though they are an important part of Arab societies and should play a role in their emerging regimes.

So it is untrue that the only viable alternative to unrelenting absolutist rule must be Islamist. The protests are clearly the result of ordinary citizens becoming fed up with corruption, the lack of any semblance of rule of law, and arbitrary treatment. There is an opportunity here to start developing pluralistic systems where not only Islamists, but also other parties and discourses can play a role.

Elections equal democracy. No one is fooled by this claim anymore. In order to maintain their dominance, Arab governments have relied on flawed laws and elections that don’t produce strong parliaments or lead to real change. Indeed, in countries like Egypt, Jordan and Tunisia, government and parliament alike were unpopular. Throughout the region, elections have been used to create a façade of democracy aimed at impressing citizens and the outside world while insulating the regimes from pressure for genuine reform.

The Arab public, however, will no longer accept the status quo. People will not be satisfied with economic handouts or cosmetic changes in governance; they are demanding real change that puts their country on a clear path toward democracy.

The international community has no role to play. While the reform process should certainly be homegrown, the United States and the rest of the international community can encourage democratic development without imposing it from afar. President Barack Obama rejected many of the policies of the George W. Bush administration that were seen as trying to force democracy on Arab countries. But the subsequent silence on democratization aggravated – though it certainly did not cause – the unraveling of the Arab reform process in the last few years.

The US and the West can discuss with Arab countries how political reform should be carried out in a way that would contribute to greater openness and opportunities for power-sharing. The West should not sacrifice these objectives for others; if allies ultimately lose power in popular revolts, such a tradeoff would not have furthered the West’s interests, to say the least.

The unfolding events grabbing headlines around the world have shattered key myths about the Arab world. These countries’ people need to start gradual, sustained, and serious political reform now. At the dawn of a new Arab era, it is up to them to build new, open political systems that can head off the looming threat of escalating crises.

Marwan Muasher.

“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to the God” Thomas Jefferson

Why have uprisings and the revolutions taken place in Arab states? That’s the question most journalists, political scientists, analysts, experts in the Middle East and Northern Africa studies ask, pondering over the reasons that triggered tectonic transformations in that part of the world. But instead of focusing on socio-cultural, political, economic or, above all, socio-economic reasons behind the Arab “spring of peoples” one may offer an alternative, unconventional approach to turbulent developments in the Arab civilization. How could Arabs stand up to their regimes and change power in a matter of days or weeks? That’s an essential question. The social network’s factor (i.e. Facebook, Twitter) was crucial in Tunisian “Jasmine Revolution” and the uprising in Egypt that toppled Hosni Mubarak. But the banal, trivial truth is that there are no simple answers to complex questions. The paramount paradox is that obedient, law-abiding, meek, and fearful of their governments Arabs dared to defy their authorities, took to the streets and squares and ousted the dictators in Tunisia and, subsequently, Egypt. And as the Arab proverb says in such a case, ‘If the wind of change blows, ride it’. The subsequent uprisings in Yemen, Jordan, Oman, Bahrain, KSA, Algeria and the revolution in Libya were caused not only by successes in Tunisia and Egypt, but, above all, by deeper understanding of the dominant religion – Islam. Better education, higher literacy rate and high percentage of young population (about 65 % of Arabs are younger than 35 yrs) played a paramount role in it. And here lies the truth. As a matter of fact, Islam means full and absolute obedience to the God (as translated from Arabic). If we really think that “resistance to tyrants is obedience to the God” (as Thomas Jefferson famously put it in “The Declaration of Independence of the United States of America”), then those Arabs who challenged the incumbent tyrants just showed their obedience to the God. So it was not the Facebook which was a main medium of social communication and key source of information in coordinating protests. Social networks were just catalysts in ‘the chain reaction’ of Arab revolutions, but it was the very combination of many factors (and religious, in my opinion, was the dominant one), which had such a powerful synergetic effect in changing geopolitical status quo in the world’s most conservative region...

Serhiy Blavatsky, Ph.D. in Social Communications.

TURKEY IMMUNE, USA BACKED BROTHERHOOD IN EGYPT AND ALL OVER MENA....

TURKEY IMMUNE, USA BACKED BROTHERHOOD IN EGYPT AND ALL OVER MENA....

Istanbul by mandalaybus )

Is Turkey already part of the New World Order?

Is it therefore immune to the CIA coups that have hit North Africa?

The key groups in Turkey are:

(1) the generals

(2) the Fethullah Gulen movement.

(CIA CONTROL VIA FETHULLAH? / THE NEW WORLD ORDER AND TURKEY)

Both are said to be tools of the CIA.

Gulen in the USA.

In previous decades the CIA controlled Turkey by getting the Turkish generals to carry out false flag terrorism and coups. (KILLING KIDS ON A FIELD TRIP; ERGENEKON AND 9 11)

Now the CIA may be using the Moslem Gulen movement to control Turkey.


Turkey - © noborders )

On 11 March 2011, at Todays Zaman, we read about Journalism during the time of Ergenekon‎

Ergenekon is the name given to the gang which carried out acts of false flag terrorism in Turkey.

It is said to have been run by Turkish generals, the CIA, NATO, and Mossad; and it is said to have links to the heroin trade.

Nedim Şener and Ahmet Şık are award-winning journalists who helped expose the Ergenekon network and a coup plan.

They have been arrested.

It is claimed by the authorities that they were members of Ergenekon.

Some people think they were arrested because of the book they wrote containing allegations against the Gülen movement.

The Gülen movement has influence in the judiciary and police.

However, it is possible that the Ergenekon gang has got certain people to write books that will 'confuse people and damage the legitimacy of the Ergenekon case.'


TURKEY - © noborders )

Allegedly, Gulen has links to the Muslim Brotherhood.

In Egypt, the U.S. Secretly Backed the Brotherhood.

According to former editor of the Japan Times Weekly, Yochi Shimatsu, writing on 17 February 2011:

1. A leaked diplomatic cable shows the US State Department, over the past three years, had secret talks with Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood.

2. The December 2008 cable is entitled "Meeting and Regime Change in Egypt".

3. Half of the suspected 9/11 hijackers, including Atta, were Egyptians linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.

4. At the first major Cairo protest on 25 January 2011, Jared Cohen, a former State Department staffer in charge of planning the Twitter revolution, was physically present with his proteges in the American-sponsored April 6 Youth Movement.

The April 6 Youth Movement is allied with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Cohen has links to Israel and the writings of Gene Sharp.

5. Former Cairo ambassador Frank Wisner Jr, an intelligence expert whose father organized Operation Gladio, landed in Egypt on 31 January.

Libya, CIA, MI6, MOSSAD, and the MSM....

Vietnamese victims of the fascist USA.

On 11 March 2011, the Libyan Ambassador to Ghana, Dr Ali Gadban, disclosed that the CIA and MI6 have been working together to topple Ghaddafi .

(CIA & MI6 scheme to topple Ghaddafi-Libyan ambassador to Ghana)

Gadban, at a press conference in Accra, said that Libya had intercepted recorded phone conversations between Libyan rebels and operatives of the CIA and the MI6.

He said that CNN, the BBC, Al-jazeera and Reuters were all part of the plot to create disaffection in Libya.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&feature=player_embedded&v=mWFftkzNRNI

The disappearance of the nightmare Arab

The disappearance of the nightmare Arab
By James Carroll

Since 2001, Americans have been living with a nightmare Arab, a Muslim monster threatening us to the core, chilling our souls with the cry, "God is great!" Yet after two months of world-historic protest and rebellion in streets and squares across the Arab world, we are finally waking up to another reality: that this was our bad dream, significantly a creation of our own fevered imaginations.

For years, vestigial colonial contempt for Arabs combined with rank prejudice against the Islamic religion, exacerbated by an obsession with oil, proved a blinding combination. Then the September 11, 2001 attack pulled its shroud across the sun. But like the night yielding to dawn, all of this now appears in a new light. Americans are seeing Arabs and Muslims as if for the first time, and we are, despite ourselves, impressed and moved. In this regard, too, the Arab revolution has been, well, revolutionary.

Absence of Arab perfidy, presence of god
For those same two months, jihadists who think nothing of slaughtering innocents in the name of Allah have been nowhere in sight, as millions of ordinary Arabs launched demonstration after demonstration with a non-violent discipline worthy of Mohandas Gandhi. True, rebels in Libya took up arms, but defensively, in order to throw back the murderous assaults of Muammar Gaddafi's men.

In the meantime, across North Africa and the Middle East, none of the usual American saws about Islamic perfidy have been evident. The demonizing of Israel, anti-Semitic sloganeering, the burning of American flags, outcries against "Crusaders and Jews" - all have been absent from nearly every instance of revolt. Osama bin Laden - to whom, many Americans became convinced in these last years, Muslims are supposed to have all but sworn allegiance - has been appealed to not at all. Where are the fatwas?

Perhaps the two biggest surprises of all here: out of a culture that has notoriously disempowered women has sprung a protest movement rife with female leadership, while a religion regarded as inherently incompatible with democratic ideals has been the context from which comes an unprecedented outbreak of democratic hope. And make no mistake: the Muslim religion is essential to what has been happening across the Middle East, even without Islamic "fanatics" chanting hate-filled slogans.

Without such fanatics, who in the West knows what this religion actually looks like?

In fact, its clearest image has been there on our television screens again and again. In this period of transformation, every week has been punctuated with the poignant formality of Friday prayers, including broadcast scenes of masses of Muslims prostrate in orderly rows across vast squares in every contested Arab capital. Young and old, illiterate and tech savvy, those in flowing robes and those in tight blue jeans have been alike in such observances. From mosque pulpits have come fiery denunciations of despotism and corruption, but no blood-thirst and none of the malicious Imams who so haunt the nightmares of Europeans and Americans.

Yet sacrosanct Fridays have consistently seen decisive social action, with resistant regimes typically getting the picture on subsequent weekends. (The Tunisian prime minister, a holdover from the toppled regime of autocrat Zine El-Abidine Ben Ali, for example, resigned on the last Sunday in February.) These outcomes have been sparked not only by preaching, but by the mosque-inspired cohesion of a collectivity that finds no contradiction between piety and political purpose; religion, that is, has been a source of resolve.

It's an irony, then, that Western journalists, always so quick to tie bad Muslim behavior to religion, have rushed to term this good Muslim behavior "secular". In a word wielded by the New York Times, Islam is now considered little but an "afterthought" to the revolution. In this, the media is simply wrong. The protests, demonstrations, and uprisings that have swept across the Middle East have visibly built their foundations on the irreducible sense of self-worth that, for believers, comes from a felt closeness to God, who is as near to each person - as the Koran says - as his or her own jugular vein. The call to prayer is a five-times-daily reminder of that infinite individual dignity.

A rejection of violence and the old lies
The new Arab condition is not Nirvana, nor has some political utopia been achieved. In no Arab state is the endgame in sight, much less played out. History warns that revolutions have a tendency to devour their children, just as it warns that every religion can sponsor violence and war as easily and naturally as non-violence and peace.

History warns as well that, in times of social upheaval, Jews are the preferred and perennial scapegoat, and the State of Israel is a ready target for that hatred. Arab bigotry has not magically gone away, nor has the human temptation to drown fear with blood. But few, if any, revolutions have been launched with such wily commitment to the force of popular will, not arms. When it comes to "people power," Arabs have given the concept several new twists.

Because so many people have believed in themselves - protecting one another simply by standing together - they have been able to reject not only violence, but any further belief in the lies of their despotic rulers. The stark absence of Israel as a major flashpoint of protest in these last weeks, to take a telling example, stands in marked contrast to the way in which the challenged or overthrown despots of various Middle Eastern lands habitually exploited both anti-Semitism (sponsoring, for instance, the dissemination through Arab newsstands of the long-discredited Protocols of the Elders of Zion) and the plight of Palestinians (feigning sympathy for the dispossessed victims of Israeli occupation while doing nothing to help them, precisely because Arab dictators needed suffering Palestinians to distract from the suffering of their own citizens).

Not surprisingly, if always sadly, the Arab revolution has brought incidents of Jew-baiting in its wake - in late February in Tunis, for example, by a mob outside the city's main synagogue. That display was, however, quickly denounced and repudiated by the leadership of the Free Tunisia movement. When a group of Cairo thugs assaulted CBS correspondent Lara Logan, they reportedly hurled the word "Jew" at her as an epithet. So yes, such incidents happened, but what makes them remarkable is their rarity on such a sprawling landscape.

To be sure, Arabs broadly identify with the humiliated Palestinians, readily identify Israel as an enemy, and resent the American alliance with Israel, but something different is unfolding now. When the United States vetoed the UN Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlements in the very thick of February's revolutionary protests, to flag one signal, the issue was largely ignored by Arab protesters. In Palestinian areas of the West Bank and Gaza, the spirit of Arab revolt showed itself mainly in a youth-driven and resolutely non-violent movement to overcome the intra-Palestinian divisions between Fatah and Hamas. Again and again, that is, the Arab Muslim population has refused to behave as Americans have been conditioned to expect.
The mainstreaming of anti-Muslim prejudice
Conditioned by whom? Prejudice against Arabs generally and Islam in particular is an old, old story. A few months ago, the widespread nature of the knee-jerk suspicion that all Muslims are potentially violent was confirmed by National Public Radio (NPR) commentator Juan Williams, who said, "I get worried. I get nervous" around those "in Muslim garb," those who identify themselves "first and foremost as Muslims".

Williams was fired by NPR, but the commentariat rallied to him for simply speaking a universal truth, one which, as Williams himself acknowledged, was to be regretted: Muslims are scary. When NPR then effectively reversed itself by forcing the resignation of the executive who had fired him, anti-Muslim bigotry was resoundingly vindicated in America, no matter the intentions of the various players.

Scary, indeed - but no surprise. Such prejudice had been woven into every fiber of American foreign and military policy across the previous decade, a period when the overheated watchword was "Islamofascism". In 2002, scholar Bernard Lewis's book What Went Wrong? draped a cloak of intellectual respectability around anti-Muslim contempt. It seemed not to have occurred to Lewis that, if such an insulting question in a book title deserves an answer at all, in the Arab context it should be: "we" did - with that "we" defined as Western civilization.

Whether the historical marker is 1099 for Crusader mayhem; 1417 for the Portuguese capture of Ceuta, the first permanent European outpost in North Africa; 1492 for the expulsion from Spain of Muslims (along with Jews); 1798 for Napoleon's arrival as a would-be conqueror in Cairo; 1869 for the opening of the Suez Canal by the French Empress Eugenie; 1917 for the British conquest of Palestine, which would start a British-spawned contest between Jews and Arabs; or the 1930s, when vast oil reserves were discovered in the Arabian Peninsula - all such Western antecedents for trouble in Arab lands are routinely ignored or downplayed in our world in favor of a preoccupation with a religion deemed to be irrational, anti-modern, and inherently hostile to democracy.

How deep-seated is such a prejudice? European Christians made expert pronouncements about the built-in violence of Islam almost from the start, although the seventh century Koran was not translated into Latin until the twelfth century. When a relatively objective European account of Islam's origins and meaning finally appeared in the eighteenth century, it was quickly added to the Roman Catholic Index of forbidden books. Western culture is still at the mercy of such self-elevating ignorance. That's readily apparent in the fact that a 14th-century slander against Islam - that it was only "spread by the sword" - was reiterated in 2006 (on the fifth anniversary of 9/11) by Pope Benedict XVI. He did apologize, but by then the Muslim-haters had been encouraged.

Western contempt for Islam is related to a post-Enlightenment distrust of all religion. In modern historiography, for instance, the brutal violence that killed millions during paroxysms of conflict across Europe in the 16th and 17th centuries is remembered as the "religious wars," even though religion was only part of a history that included the birth of nations and nationalism, as well as of industrial capitalism, and the opening of the "age of exploration," also known as the age of colonial exploitation.

"Secular" sources of violence have always been played down in favor of sacred causes, whether the Reformation, Puritan fanaticism, or Catholic anti-modernism. "Enlightened" nation-states were all-too-ready to smugly denounce primitive and irrational religious violence as a way of asserting that their own expressly non-religious campaigns against rival states and aboriginal peoples were necessary and therefore just. In this tale, secular violence is as rational as religious violence is irrational. That schema holds to this day and is operative in Iraq and Afghanistan, where the United States and its North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies pursue dogmatically ideological and oil-driven wars that are nonetheless virtuous simply by not being "religious".
No fatwas for us. Never mind that these wars were declared to be "against evil", with God "not neutral", as George W Bush blithely put it. And never mind that US forces (both the military and the private contractors) are strongly influenced by a certain kind of fervent Christian evangelicalism that defines the American enemy as the "infidel" - the Muslim monster unleashed. In any case, ask the families of the countless dead of America's wars if ancient rites of human sacrifice are not being re-enacted in them? The drone airplane and its Hellfire missile are weapons out of the Book of the Apocalypse.

The revolution of hope
The new Arab revolution, with its Muslim underpinnings, is an occasion of great hope. At the very least, "we" in the West must reckon with this overturning of the premises of our prejudice.

Yes, dangers remain, as Arab regimes resist and revolutionaries prepare to erect new political structures. Fanatics wait in the wings for the democrats to falter, while violence, even undertaken in self-defense, can open onto vistas of vengeance and cyclic retribution. Old hatreds can re-ignite, and the never-vanquished forces of white supremacist colonial dominance can re-emerge.

But that one of the world's great religions is essential to what is unfolding across North Africa and the Middle East offers the promise that this momentous change can lead, despite the dangers, to humane new structures of justice and mercy, which remain pillars of the Islamic faith. For us, in our world, this means we, too, will have been purged of something malicious - an ancient hatred of Muslims and Arabs that now lies exposed for what it always was.

James Carroll, bestselling author of Constantine's Sword, is a columnist for the Boston Globe and a Distinguished Scholar-in-Residence at Suffolk University in Boston. His newest book, Jerusalem, Jerusalem: How the Ancient City Ignited Our Modern World (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt), has just been published.

JEWS PRETENDING TO BE MUSLIMS OR CHRISTIANS

Mohamed Atta....

Why did Mohamed Atta speak Hebrew? (Mohamed Atta loved pork chops, cocaine, hookers ...)

On 21 February 2011, the Israeli daily Yediot Ahronot reported on ten Jews, of Iraqi origin, who were trained to act as Moslems.

The training took part in the mid 1950s.

To improve their cover, the men married Moslem women and produced families.

The men were then sent into Israeli Arab communities, posing as Jews.

The job of these sleeper agents was to spy on the Arabs.

('Your Muslim husband is a Jew' The Australian)

In 1964, the men's wives were flown to Paris to be met by a Mossad officer who told them that their husbands were secretly Jews.

The Mossad station chief told the women they could either join their husbands in a Jewish community, or they could be resettled in an Arab country of their choice.

The women chose to remain with their husbands and so they were converted to Judaism.

"The kids experienced serious trauma. They tried to forget their past, where they came from, but they couldn't."

The Larijani family in Iran are Jewish.....

http://echkelon.blogspot.com/2009/04/other-four-larijani-brothers.html

Mouammar Gaddafi of Libya is Jewish, his mother is Jewish and his second wife comes from the Farkash family....

http://anaconda-manifesto.blogspot.com/2011/02/kaddafis-mother-is-jewish-so-muammar.html

http://geofinancial.blogspot.com/2011/02/kaddafi-mossad-renditions-cia-and.html

David Headley.

'Moslem' terrorist David Headley visited various Jewish sites in India.

He claimed to be Jewish when he reportedly stayed at the Chabad centre in Mumbai in July 2008.

The American FBI found a book in his bag in Chicago entitled 'To Pray as a Jew'. (Cached )

This al-Qaeda guy is Jewish (Website for this image)

This guy, Frank Collin Cohen, is Jewish (Website for this image - snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.com)

This guy, Bill White, is Jewish (Website for this image - snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.com)

According to Rose Cohen, of Sydney, Australia: "A very close friend and a most eminent Israeli journalist told me recently, that according to Jewish law - bin Laden is Jewish, as his mother is Jewish...

"This irrefutably honest Israeli journalist, disclosed to me personally that bin Laden's mother's family lives in Israel. I knew that bin Laden was Jewish long time ago..." (Bali, Australia And The Mossad)

Ataturk was Jewish?

9 11 has links to Tony Blair.

Sarah Margaret (née Lipsett), gave birth to Tony Blair's mother, Hazel.

The Lipsett family originated with a German Jewish immigrant to Ireland. (Tony Blair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

Texe Marrs reported on Hillary Clinton's Jewish ancestry.

He reported that John Kerry, Madeleine Albright, and General Wesley Clark have Jewish origins. "Hillary, Kerry, Clark and Albright subsequently came out of the closet and owned up to their Jewish heritage." (New World Order)

Bush.

9 11 has links to Saudi Arabia.

"Jews have lived in Saudi Arabia for over 1400 years.

"Several Arab/Muslim intelligence agencies think the Saudi royal clan are Crypto-Jewish." (More Crypto-Jews in the Muslim world?)

" This publication of the National Jewish Welfare Board lists a Major George Bush, Major Louis Bush, and Major Solomon Bush, as Jews participating in the American Revolutionary War against the British." (New World Order )

9 11 has links to Turkey.

In the summer of 2001, 4 months before 9 11, the FBI's monitoring of Turkish agents revealed Turkish contacts with Feith, Wolfowitz, and Perle.

These people had discussions with the Turkish ambassador in Washington.

The subject of the discussions was a deal whereby the U.S. would invade Iraq. (TOP US OFFICIALS REPORTEDLY INVOLVED IN GANGSTERISM.)

churchofnobody.blogspot/ has reminded us of the donmeh, the 'Jewish' Turks.

Armenian Holocaust

According to Dr. Jacob M. Landau (Jewish Political Studies Review 19:1-2 (Spring 2007) ):

"The extreme nationalists have accused the dönmes of taking a leading part in the Young Turk plot in Salonica (a very exaggerated claim), thus contributing to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the destruction of its traditions.

"The Islamists have accused them not only of still being Crypto-Jews rather than Muslims, but also of abolishing the Caliphate and plotting to introduce secularism into Turkey, thus causing the decline of Islam there.

"Both groups (and some others as well) have accused the dönmes of participating in-or even masterminding-a worldwide conspiracy to Westernize Turkey and of being in league with communists and other subversive elements aiming to dominate Turkey and the world.

Armenian Holocaust

"Some of these arguments were used against Jews as well, making both Jews and dönmes supposedly guilty of the same misdeeds.

"An instance is the claim that Jews and dönmes were chiefly responsible for the tragedy of the Armenians in 1915.

"A debate about the dönmes and their true nature that had started in 1919 continued in the republic during the 1920s, mostly in the Turkish press and a few pamphlets. It maintained that the dönmes had remained Jewish in outward appearance and in innate characteristics, these being chiefly duplicity, vain superstitions, and unacceptable sexual practices..."

It has been claimed "that many politicians and businessmen in Turkey and elsewhere are in fact Jews or dönmes." (Jewish Political Studies Review 19:1-2 (Spring 2007) )

Merkel is yet another Zionist leader

On a bulletin board at 911oz - Australian 9/11 Truth Movement we read: "Nathanael Kapner says Jews plotted the Armenian Holocaust."

According to one post:

1716: A group called the 'Donmeh' forms in Salonica... They were known as Crypto Jews because though outwardly appearing to be Muslims, they were still Jews...

1860: Jewish Hungarian Zionist named Arminius Vambery becomes an advisor to the Sultan Abdul Mecit... Vambery tries to broker a deal between the Zionist leader Theodore Herzl and Sultan Abdul Mecit over the creation of Israel but fails.

1891: Out of the Donmeh a Zionist political group forms ... later called The Young Turks. The group is headed by a Freemason Jew by the name of Emmanuel Carraso who organizes the secret Committee of Union and Progress in Geneva with the help of the Rothschilds.

Young Turks

1895-1896: Sephardic Jews of Salonika together with the Turks massacre Armenian Christians in Istanbul.

1902 & 1907: Two Congresses of The Young Turks meet in Paris to plan, prepare, and effect the penetration the Sultan’s army leading to the military coup of 1908.

1908: The Jewish Young Turks revolt and force the Sultan Abdul Hamid II into submission.

1909: The Jewish Young Turks rape, torture, and slaughter over 100,000 Armenians in the city of Adana, also known as Cilicia.

Assassination leads to World War I and Turkey's loss of Palestine.

1914: The Jews of The Young Turks create unrest, turmoil, and bolster the paid Serbian assassin, Gavrilo Princip, which leads to World War I.

1915: The Armenian Holocaust engineered by the ruling Jews of The Young Turks, leaves 1.5 million Armenian Christians starved, tortured, and murdered.

1918: Jew Mustafa Kemal ‘Attaturk’ ascends into leadership.

1920: Russian Jewish Bolsheviks supply Attaturk with 10 million gold roubles, 45,000 rifles, and 300 machine guns with ammunition.

1921: Attaturk occupies the Port of Batu in conjunction with the Russian Jewish Bolsheviks ceding it to the Bolsheviks five days later. The Rothschilds are delighted.

1922: Jewish Khemalists orchestrate the burning of Smyrna resulting in the ‘ethnic cleansing’ of over 100,000 Armenian and Greek Christians left tortured, starved, raped, and dead.

Murdered armenians (vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2007/10/should-arm...)

The post suggests the following were Jewish:

1. Emmanuel Carraso: B’nai B’rith Official of Italian origin. Grand Master of the Macedonia Ressurected Masonic Lodge in Salonika; established the 'secret' Committee of Union & Progress (Young Turks) in Salonika in 1890.

2. Tallaat Pasha (1874-1921): Thought to be a Turk but in reality a “Donmeh Jew.” Interior Minister of Turkey during World War I; Member of Carasso’s Masonic lodge and Grand Master of the Scottish Rite Masons in Turkey; Chief architect of the Armenian Holocaust and Director of Deportations. He wrote, “By continuing the deportation of the Armenians to their destinations during the intense cold we are ensuring their eternal rest.”

3. Djavid Bey: “Donmeh Jew.” Talaat’s Finance Minister; Arranged the finances of revolution in Turkey with the Rothschilds; Later assasinated by Attaturk as a perceived rival.

4. Messim Russo: Assistant to Djavid Bey.

Armenian Holocaust

5. Refik Bey, AKA Refik Saydam Bey: Editor of Young Turk newpaper Revolutionary Press; Became Prime Minister of Turkey in 1939.

6. Emanuel Qrasow: Jewish propagandist for The Young Turks. Headed the delegation to inform Sultan Abdul Hamid II that "The nation has removed you from your office."

7. Vladimir Jabotinsky: Russian Zionist who moved to Turkey in 1908. Supported by B’nai Brith of London and Dutch Zionist millionaire, Jacob Kann; Editor of Young Turk newpaper. Later started the terrorist Irgun political party in Israel.

8. Alexander Helphand, AKA Parvus: Financier/liaison of the Rothschilds of the Young Turk revolution; Editor of The Turkish Homeland.

9. Mustafa Kemal ‘Attaturk’ (1881-1938): A Jew of Sephardic (Spanish) origin. Attaturk attended the Jewish elementary school known as Semsi Effendi School run by the Jew Simon Zvi. Over 12,000 Jews welcomed to Turkey by Attaturk in 1933 when Hitler came to power.

Queen Victoria's husband Prince Albert may have been Jewish. (aangirfan: British Royal Family's Irish and Jewish Links)

~

Kaddafi's mother is Jewish, so Muammar Kaddafi is Jewish and it was known since 1970...

During a discussion on Israel Radio they just dropped this little tidbit. There is a Jew left in Libya. His name is Muammar Kaddafi. At first, I found it hard to believe, but when I Googled "Kaddafi's mother was Jewish" (without the quotes), the first three results all confirmed it. Kaddafi's mother was a Jewish woman who converted to Islam at the age of 9 or the daughter of a Jewish woman who left her husband for an Arab Sheikh. Those two narratives are not mutually exclusive. I kid you not...Muammar Kaddafi's mother was Jewish and his second wife is from the "Farkash" family.....

A very likely refuge for Muammar Qaddafi, Come and be an Israeli, for he is a Jew...!

http://www.economist.com/node/21528675?fsrc=scn/tw/te/ar/comeandbeanisraeli

The article reports that an Israeli woman named Gita Boaron is claiming that her great-grandmother was Qaddafi's grandmother, which, according to both Judaic Law (as membership in the Am or People is transmitted maternally) and Israeli Law (the right of return regarding Jews and Israeli citizenship), makes Qaddafi eligible for Israeli citizenship. Oy vey indeed!

IF HE needs a refuge, Colonel Muammar Qaddafi might consider the Israeli town of Netanya. An Israeli family of Libyan origin has recently surfaced saying they are the colonel’s relatives and that he should think of making aliyah (the Jewish voyage of return) and claim Israeli citizenship as any Jew may do under Israeli law. Gita Boaron told Israeli television she shares a great-grandmother with the colonel. “She fled her Jewish husband for a Muslim sheikh,” she says. “Her daughter was the colonel’s mother, making him Jewish under rabbinic law.”

Some jokers suggest that Mrs Boaron’s family want a share of the gold the colonel is said to be carrying. But others say there may be a more solid claim. “Jews from Tripoli remember he attended a Jewish wedding in the 1960s, long before he became leader,” says Pedazur Benattia, founder of Or Shalom, a centre that promotes Libyan-Jewish culture in Israel.

In Netanya, a resort north of Tel Aviv, where many of the 100,000-odd Israeli Jews of Libyan origin have settled, a square has been called Qaddafi Plaza in anticipation of his arrival. “Whatever he’s done, Israel’s his home,” says Rachel, a widow sipping her macchiato, Libya’s beverage of choice, and nibbling abambara, a Libyan-Jewish pastry in one of the square’s Libyan-owned cafés. “After all, he’s a Jew.” With his curls, she says, he would fit into many a Libyan synagogue.

The colonel’s popularity is odd since he chased non-Muslims, Italian Catholics and Jews alike out of Libya and took their property. But Israel’s Libyan Jews say he has sought to atone for his youthful Arab radicalism. In the New York Times in 2009 the Great Leader noted that “Jews and Muslims are cousins descended from Abraham. The Jewish people,” he added understandingly, “want and deserve their homeland.”

Other family members are said to have kept up the tradition. Israeli tabloids make much of reports that Saif al-Islam, the colonel’s son and oft-presumed heir, used to date Orly Weinermann, a sometime scantily clad Israeli soap-opera actress. Quite a few of the colonel’s Libyan foes believe such gossip. Graffiti with Stars of David superimposed on swastikas have spattered the walls of Benghazi, the rebels’ eastern base. “Qaddafi Mossad agent,” reads one of the banners....

http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2011/09/is-zionism-a-positive-expression-of-jewish-nationalism-.html#comments

A year and a half ago, two Israeli women who claimed to be relatives of Kaddafi's were interviewed on Israel's Channel 2 television.

The older of the two interviewees, Guita Brown, claimed that she is Kaddafi’s second cousin: her grandmother was the sister of Gaddafi’s grandmother. The younger of the two women, Rachel Saada, Brown's granddaughter , explained in more detail: “The story goes that Kaddafi’s grandmother, a Jewess, was married to a Jewish man at first. But he treated her badly, so she ran away and married a Muslim sheikh. Their child was the mother of Kaddafi.” While Kaddafi’s grandmother converted to Islam when she married the sheikh, according to Jewish religious law (and common sense), she was ethnically still Jewish. And that makes Kaddafi's mother a Jewess. And if Kaddafi's mother is a Jewess, what does that make Kaddafi? A Jew....

Let's go to the videotape (sorry - the interview is only in Hebrew).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QAlBP7rNeKc


That means Kaddafi is Jewish - he can even be counted in a minyan (quorum of Jews for prayer).

More to the point, Kaddafi is entitled to 'return' to Israel under the Law of Return. Given that he may soon be looking for political asylum and the usual candidates (the Saudis and the Europeans) are unlikely to take him, could he be looking to come to Israel?
....

Muammar Kaddafi is Jewish.

What it amounts to is that Rachel's aunt, a Jewess married a Jew, had a son Moamar Qaddafi with the Jew, she skipped town on her Jewish husband and married a Muslim Sheikh, who brought little Moamar Kaddafi up....

That is the gist of the story! Moamar's father and mother were both Jewish!

Israeli actress Orly Weinerman is the lover/wife to be ...? of Saif Al-Islam Qaddafi who meet regularly in Italy and other places....

http://www.tgcom.mediaset.it/gossip/articoli/articolo291739.shtml

Cass Sunstein has released the cyber dogs of war. He and his minions will eventually end up like Mubarak, Ben Ali and Qaddafi.....

The American Jewish Committee attempts to suspend Libya from UN Human Rights Council.

Although Libyan diplomats are defecting, the American Jewish Committee manipulators would deny the diplomats a voice on the UN Committee. Another cheap "its only about the Jews" political stunt from David Harris and his cabal....because they are covering up for Kaddafi who is a JEW....and it's well known since 1970s.....while the Kaddafi family thugs are butchering thousands of Libyans back home, using Serbs, Croats, Chadians, Ghanaians, Sudanese....etc.

Why Obama and Clinton are hesitant to see Qaddafi toppled. "The word from Whitehall is that, although Parliament is in summer recess, senior staffers know that a major secret deal [release by Scotland of PanAm 103 alleged bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi] was worked out between Number 10 and Number 11 Downing Street (the residences of the Prime Minister and Chancellor of the Exchequer, respectively) and [Muammar] Qaddafi and sealed after a meeting two weeks ago between [Peter] Mandelson and Qaddafi's son, Saif al Islam Qaddafi, at a Rothschild family-owned villa on Corfu." The Rothschild's own George Soros and Soros owns Obama and Clinton. Cut and dry back room politics....

We have been contacted by an associate of Dr Saad al Faqih, leader of the London-based Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia (MIRA). The US State Department considers him a terrorist because he wants to overthrow the Saudi regime. He is not a terrorist and in a conversation with him in 2002, he told me that he wants a democratic Arabia, one, thankfully, without the Sauds in control. Of course, for the Bushes, Obama's, Clintons, and the other vile oligarchs, his group has been designated a terrorist organization, when, in fact, the real terrorists are the awful Sauds.....

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/02/21/dimitri-khalezov-gordon-duff-and-kevin-barrett-nuclear-terrorism/

US troops overseas given orders to kill civilians have an option just like the Libyan and Tunisian troops had an option and the Russian troops in WWI had an option. They can turn their weapons on their officers who give those illegal orders. That is something I will support. When I was an officer and stationed overseas, if given an illegal order, I would have also exercised the option. And many in Vietnam did with a little-talked-about option called "fragging."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgvR67Ktwio&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=kwu9yRBHKU0

http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/World/Story/A1Story20110221-264590.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=OkBtOPvfB_k

Who actually funds the neo-Nazi groups like American Free Press, the former Spotlight, and the others....

"Meredith Rode, who defended former American Nazi Party member John Patler (aka John Patsalos) for assassinating American Nazi Party leader George Lincoln Rockwell on August 25, 1967, said there were a number of contradictions in the evidence used to convict Patler. Rockwell was an enigma. His parents were vaudevillian comedians who counted a number of Jewish celebrities among their colleagues and friends, including Benny Goodman, Groucho Marx, Jack Benny, and Walter Winchell. While serving in the Navy during World War II, Rockwell was sympathetic towards segregated African American sailors. Oddly, after the Korean War, in which Rockwell served in the Navy, he began a publication aimed at servicemen's wives, U.S. Lady, a competitor to the two major women's magazines of the time, Redbook and McCall's, both published by Marvin Pierce, the father of Barbara Bush and grandfather of George W. Bush.

Rockwell's entrance into right-wing politics came through his employment with William F. Buckley's National Review. Rockwell soon left Buckley and started the American Nazi Party. A one-time journalist for the Reader's Digest and Human Events who interviewed Rockwell at his Arlington, Virginia headquarters told this editor that Rockwell, who regularly launched vicious attacks on Jews from a position on the Washington Mall, ironically near what is now the US Holocaust Museum, was discovered to have received donations from the Anti Defamation League (ADL). Apparently, Rockwell's attacks on Jews were financially lucrative for the donation coffers of both the American Nazis and the ADL.

Rockwell lived only two minutes after he was shot through the windshield of his car at an Arlington, Virginia shopping center."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qa3X4paPCGo

What is going on in Libya behind the blood a-flowin'? Just part of the sweeping revolution all made by the people? Our Mossad friends in Arab drag in the streets inciting it? Good old CIA, USAID, NED, AmeriCares or any others? Soros burst into bloom in another revolution? How convenient that the US meant to do something about Libya in their nation-building and there is a leaderless Libya now and the US "pondering steps" to take...what is really going on there? Qaddafi's time is up....?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vdSjyvIHVLw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=brQqRLCxJew

....

It looks as if a sand storm is in its peak now in the Middle East. How can all this be understood?

I understand that Americans look at this whole storm from their perspective and more or less within the context of the debate that has been going on in the US for some time now. But the fact is that people in the region are not aware of these perspectives and debates. They have their own motives and ideas and they are busy making their own history according to their own perceptions...http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2045328_2045333_2053107,00.html.

This sand storm, like some other storms, blows away layers of sand to reveal skeletons of dead animals, useless rocks and sometime hidden treasures. What is it that we will find at the end of these breathtaking events that seem to take everyone by surprise, including some of those who protest everywhere in the region now?

Any attempt to predict the outcome should first be based on understanding the reasons why all this is happening. It should, second, be limited to some general trends and predictions. Real life is green. Our words, plans, schemes and analysis are not. They are Grey. You can never predict the number of fragments of a bomb and where each will go. But, you can be sure that it will explode

We probably should go back to the last sand storm which took the region also by surprise. That was the series of military coups which changed the face of the region during the 50s and 60s. Egypt was the first, followed by Syria, then Iraq, Yemen and Libya. Some countries like Syria and Iraq witnessed several coups. And some countries like Algeria and Sudan could be put in the same category at least from the perspective of this short analysis.

Those events were in general the reflection of two intertwined factors. The first was the weakness of the old colonial empires after the Second World War. The colonized peoples felt that the time was ripe to rid their countries of foreign occupation. But the departure of the colonial powers left a political vacuum. This vacuum was filled by the one institution that was armed and relatively organized. The military.

This was not inevitable. The military could have worked in stabilizing these countries then giving power back to the civilians. But the reasons why it happened the way it did was a combination of several factors. One of them is what is called “the oriental mode of governance.” This is not some “genetic” or Semitic issue. We saw have seen the same thing in many other places. But it is not our issue now.

Another factor was the interaction between the new juntas and the surrounding events. In Egypt for example, the business community flourished during the Second World War due to the decline of imports from England, the occupier, which saw its industrial base either destroyed or busy with military production. When the war was over, England refused to recognize this fact and rejected the calls for abrogating the 1936 treaty. Businesses and workers were hurt badly with the return of British products to the markets.

Nasser was determined to end the British occupation. Egyptian “industrialists“ were also calling for a kind of agricultural reform to widen the consumer base and increase their purchasing power through a distribution of wealth in the biggest sector of that time, rural Egypt. The first law calling for redistributing agriculture land and imposing a cap on the maximum ownership of land ( 200 Feddens- that is 210 acres aprox) was introduced in 1948 under the royal government. Nasser did the same thing but simply by military decree which was then called a law.

The “Free”officers of the junta found that they could fulfill the aspirations of the population through military decrees. They negotiated the departure of the Brits in 1954, and nationalized the Suez Canal in 1956. The population was happy and contented with their place in the receiving end of the equation. The military was contented with the free hand they got to run the country.

The junta had a lot of capital by the end of the 50’s. The fees of the canal, the yield of the confiscated land which was not totally distributed and the income of the state. All of that created the idea of establishing the “public sector” which was soon to turn into the major economic sector in Egypt, hence to Nasser’s “Egyptian Socialism”.

But the one factor that is meaningful to this analysis is that “democracy” was not an issue then. The population was happy with the way it was. No one thought of the basic freedoms which were also confiscated to create the elephant of the public sector. When Nasser died in 1970 the Egyptians offered him the biggest funeral in the history of mankind. Five million Egyptians followed his coffin in the streets of Cairo.

The second part of this analysis will focus on the reasons why Nasser’s regime, which remained in power-in its political form- until the 25^th of this January, had to collapse in order to pave the road toward a Second Egyptian Republic and to the second major shift in the Middle East in a century...

The Qaddafi regime....

The Qaddafi regime (we used to call it the Government of Libya) and several other Middle Eastern and North African states are in big trouble. Revolutionary hysteria is once again developing in the 24/7 cable news media. Dylan Ratigan clearly sees himself as either Tom Paine or Robespierre depending on the hour. A "guest" on his show just said that Mubarak, like the Qaddafi regime, ordered Egyptian Air Force aircraft to fire on the Cairo crowds. I do not know that this is true, but, clearly for the jacobins, truth means nothing.

No one should be sorry to see Qaddafi the JEW..., and his Jewish Mafia go.... His sons will not go quietly and the likelihood of large scale bloodshed is pronounced. the country is a collage of variegated tribes, sects, military factions, etc. As the benighted Saif-al-Islam Qaddafi said yesterday, anything can happen now. A "spike" in prices on the spot oil market is inevitable and it may go very high if the flow from Libyan oil ports is interrupted for long.

In the Gulf, I do not think that regime change in Bahrain or Kuwait is likely in spite of the designation of these governments by the media as "regimes." Saudi Arabia will intervene, if necessary, militarily to prevent that. The precedent for the Shia population of the Eastern Province would be much too beguiling for the Saudi "regime" to allow regime change to occur. In the event of such intervention the police troops of the Ministry of Interior (Prince Naif), and the Saudi National Guard (SANG-an all Sunni tribal Bedouin) force would be the instruments of choice. If that happens expect to see a lot of blood. Those Bedouins do not like Shia in the best of times.

Yemen. Saleh will manage this to a successful conclusion....But, Syria is next....

The Jacobin neocons are crowing in delight at the prospect of revolution. We will see how long that lasts....

SUDAN, LIBYA, Yemen, KSA, SYRIA, THEN CHINA and India by 2015....

Muttasim Gaddafi, who reportedly once plotted against his father....

Kaddafi is Jewish.

We imagine that many of the top people in Libya have long been working for the CIA/MOSSAD and its friends.

There will be CIA-generals and Loyal-to-Gaddafi generals.

Worryingly, NATO may use the unrest as pretext to invade Libya.

The USA's 'Delta Force' entered Libya in 1984. ("How Delta Force Works")

Are they back again?

Saif Gaddafi, friend of the Rothschild's.

Can Gaddafi trust his own children?

Gaddafi's adopted daughter Hannah was murdered by the USA in 1986.

Saif, the president's second-eldest son, runs a charity called the Gaddafi International Charity and Development Foundation.

It has sent hundreds of tons of aid to Haiti. (Gaddafi's sons and their lavish spending)

Saif "has extremely powerful friends in Britain, among them Prince Andrew and the Rothschild's as well as Peter Mandelson." (Gaddafi heir Saif inevitably is a friend of Andy and Mandy)

Saif did a PhD at the London School of Economics, a place that reportedly recruits spies.

Saif and Prince Andrew "have a mutual close friend, the Kazakh-born socialite and businesswoman Goga Ashkenazy."

Nat and Saif and Nat Rothschild "have a friend in common, Oleg Deripaska." (Gaddafi heir Saif inevitably is a friend of Andy and Mandy )

Sa'adi, third-eldest son, has been a professional footballer and has had problems with drugs and alcohol. (WikiLeaks cables: A guide to Gaddafi's 'famously fractious' family.)

Mutassim Gaddafi, the fourth son, is currently National Security Advisor.

He spent years in Egypt after allegedly plotting to oust his father. (France24 - The Gaddafi family tree)

Ayesha, a Gaddafi daughter, joined the defense team of the fake Saddam Hussein.

She is a 'UN Goodwill Ambassador'.


The Land Destroyer blog (The Middle East & then the World) reports that the CIA plans are revealed in the RAND Corporation's 2007 report entitled "Building Moderate Muslim Networks" and the Brookings Institute's "Which Path to Persia?".

The chief targets are still Russia, INDIA and China.

And they have already been infiltrated.

According to Land Destroyer:

"Men like Mikhail Khodorkovsky ... began building networks of NGOs modeled directly after those of the Anglo-Americans in the West, even naming this network the 'Open Russian Foundation' after George Soros' Open Society Foundation.

"According to geopolitical researcher William Engdahl, this Open Russian Foundation included Henry Kissinger and Lord Jacob Rothschild on its board of directors and its goal was to transform Russia from a sovereign state and into something more palatable for globalist consumption."

Thanks to Putin, Khodorkovsky is now in jail.

Freedom House's list of "Who's Next" includes: Belarus and the Ukraine.

"The globalists' hope is to renew political unrest in Russia's satellite regions." (Land Destroyer)


Libda's Gallery

The globalists are keeping an eye on China which buys oil from the Sudan and Iran.

Chinese has been building ports in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Myanmar.

The US Strategic Studies Institute's (SSI) suggests that China can either join the New World Order or face military confrontation. (Land Destroyer)

"The US ... is attempting to balkanize Pakistan ... specifically the Baluchistan region where China is establishing a naval presence...

"The US is also heavily involved in destabilizing Myanmar (Burma)..."

Strategically important Thailand "has suffered multiple attempts by the US to affect regime change.

"Their man, Thaksin Shinawatra is an overt globalist, having formally served as an adviser to the Carlyle Group... (The Middle East & then the World)

Tripoli by Sammy Naas

What about South America?

Recently Argentina seized weapons and drugs onboard a US Air Force plane.

"This is leading many, including the government of Argentina, to believe the US is staging another round of destabilization efforts in South America." (The Middle East & then the World)

Venezuela and Bolivia are among the countries that have recently been targeted by the CIA.

~~

Thanks to Brian for this link: BBC News Africa Mandela welcomes 'brother leader' Gaddafi

~~

Is Qaddafi Working With Mossad/CIA.....?

Criminal Khadafy using similar tricks used to give away Iraq to Israel, Khadafy is playing the exact same scenario and he is giving blatantly Libya away to USA/Israel as planned. As explained during the Tunisian intifada in this blog, the US, Britain, Israel, France prepare for the military invasion and division of MENA, Libya, Algeria, Sudan and way beyond creating hundreds of Tribes with Flags..... Libyan and Algerian peoples are preparing to fight and expel all the western Zionist mercenaries as an entire part of their Revolutions ! This is the war USA/Israel wanted.... !

Take control of Tunisia, and then divide Libya in 'small emirates' and Algeria. Israeli plan to seize Arab oil and gas in North Africa. Peoples in North Africa are fully aware of the Israelis plans and prepared for this scenario. Kaddafi family is playing their part of the plan, giving Libya to Israel... as Iraq was given before ! These are deliberate 'mistakes' like the one we saw in 1990 in Kuwait...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-prepares-invasion-of-libya-under-humanitarian-cover.html

http://truthjihad.blogspot.com/2011/02/they-hate-our-meaning-explaining-wests.html#comment-form

More evidence that criminal Kadhafi is offering for free Libya to Israel as pre-planned before 'fleeing officially' the country, like Iraq was 'offered' to Israel in 1990....

Is Qaddafi Working With Mossad/CIA.....?

February 24, 2011

The evidence indicates that Muammar Qaddafi, who controls the largest oil reserves in Africa, is secretly working with the Rothschild family and the Mossad.

"Fighter aircraft were bombing civilians on the streets of Tripoli, this is unprecedented violence." - Ali al-Essawi, Libyan Ambassador to India, 22 February 2011


Gaddafi’s youngest son Khamis was reportedly bringing mercenaries from African countries to fight against anti-regime protestors. Identity cards from Guinea, Niger, Chad, Mauritania and Sudan were found on individuals wearing Libyan uniforms and killed in the eastern city of Benghazi and other locations.
- Using Mercenaries to Quell Libya Revolution

A video image of one of Qaddafi's mercenaries who was killed...


...while other suspected African mercenaries stand in a room in a court in Benghazi as they are held by anti-Qaddafi protesters, February 24, 2011.

Is Muammar Qaddafi, the brutal and mercurial Libyan dictator, working with Israel's Mossad? The evidence suggests that he is. We need to remember that the Mossad works hand-in-hand with the Rothschild family, which controls global mining and oil production operations. Libya has the largest proven reserves of oil in Africa and exports about 1.5 million barrels per day and has important refineries that supply essential petroleum products to Europe.

Let's look at the evidence that Qaddafi is working with the Rothschild family and their intelligence agency, the Mossad.

First, Libya invested a reported $500 million into Allen Stanford's money laundering operation that was exposed two years ago this month to be a scam in which some $8 billion disappeared. Stanford's operation, based in Antigua and Houston, was one in which senior Mossadniks were both investors and recipients of investments from Allen Stanford. The Israeli venture capital funds which received millions of dollars from Stanford are all closely linked to the Mossad. Yair Shamir, the son of the infamous terrorist leader Yitzchak Shamir, was one of the investors in Stanford's "bank" in Antigua.

Yair Shamir (inset), the son of the notorious Zionist terrorist Yitzchak Shamir, is chairman and managing partner of the Catalyst Fund, a Mossad venture capital fund that received tens of millions of dollars from the Allen Stanford money-laundering operation. Shamir was also an investor in the Stanford bank.

Qaddafi invested the $500 million in Stanford's operation three weeks before the fund collapsed owing investors some $8 billion. The Stanford bank was reportedly a Mossad money-laundering operation funded with illegal drug profits. Libya, however, has never made a claim for the lost $500 million. Why would Qaddafi invest half a billion dollars in a Mossad-linked scam and not ask for the money back?

Secondly, there is the Rothschild connection to Qaddafi, through his son Saif. As the Daily Mail reported on February 24:

The friendship of oddball financier Nat Rothschild, 39, scion of one of Europe’s most distinguished Jewish families, with Colonel Gaddafi’s epicene son, Saif, is remarkable. Colonel Gaddafi confiscated all Jewish property in Libya when he came to power. All debts to Jews were cancelled and emigration legally prohibited. But in 2004 – the year Tony Blair befriended the Libyan madman – Gaddafi said he would discuss compensating Jews stripped of their possessions. It’s said Saif – who hoped to succeed his father – was behind these moves. A sop to Nat Rothschild?

Nat Rothschild works closely with the Qaddafi family.

Then there is the fact that Tony Blair serves as an adviser to Muammar Qaddafi. But who is Blair serving? It is well known that Blair is a Zionist-controlled politician who has sacrificed hundreds of British lives in the criminal fraud known as the "War on Terror". The Daily Mail reported in July 2010 that Blair had secret talks with Qaddafi in Tripoli:

Tony Blair was flown to Libya for secret talks with Colonel Gaddafi just days after denying he was an adviser to the dictator. Mr Blair was 'entertained as a brother', a senior Libyan government source has revealed. He told the Daily Mail that the former prime minister had offered Gaddafi, with whom he is on first-name terms, 'a great deal of invaluable advice'.

Mr Blair is said to be on first-name terms with the Libyan dictator and was treated like a 'brother' on his visit, according to the Daily Mail (U.K.)...


...although Britain officially blamed Qaddafi for the terror bombing of Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie.

Tony Blair is just one of the many Zionist-controlled politicians who have embraced the madman of Tripoli. Silvio Berlusconi of Italy, for example, who is very close to Qaddafi, was given the "Distinguished Statesman Award" by the Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith in September 2003. If Qaddafi were really the terrorist behind Pan Am 103, would Berlusconi and all these other Zionist-controlled western leaders be allowed to embrace him as a friend?

Lastly, there is the claim made by Victor Ostrovsky in his books about the Mossad that Israeli agents based in Tripoli had sent messages that appeared to have been sent by Qaddafi's government. These counterfeit messages were picked up by American intelligence and were used to build their case against Libya. If Mossad was running such operations in Libya in the 1980s it is most likely that their penetration of Qaddafi's government only deepened in the 25 years since. The evidence strongly indicates that is the case.

SARAH IN TRIPOLI

The revolt and bloodshed in Libya will certainly lead to the end of the 42-year-old regime of Col. Muammar al-Gaddafi and his thugs. There is very little television footage coming from Libya, but the BBC Newhour program (of February 20) had an excellent telephone interview with a young Libyan woman named Sarah, in Tripoli. This is a very powerful and moving interview that helps one understand what is really happening in Libya. The interview with "Sarah in Tripoli" begins shortly after minute 26 and 30 seconds into the program. One can use the time button and begin listening at 26:30.

The interview can be heard on the BBC World Service website here:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/p00drdqn/Newshour_20_02_2011_(2100_GMT)

Col. Muammar al-Gaddafi has been dictator of oil-rich Libya since 1969


Gaddafi and Silvio Berlusconi of Italy are quite close. Libya has many investments in Italy, the Guardian reported, "These include a stake of about 2% in Fiat, 7.5% of Juventus football club, a 2% stake in – and joint venture with – Italian aerospace and defence group Finmeccanica and 7.5% in UniCredit, the bank."


Britain's Tony Blair, who is controlled by Zionist money, was quite willing to embrace the madman of Libya - the same Arab tyrant who is said to have been behind the terror bombing over Lockerbie. How much sense does this make?


Qaddafi with Nicholas Sarkozy of France


Gaddafi and President Obama shaking hands

Hillary Clinton with Mutassim Gaddafi, one of his sons.

Libyan atrocities span 4 decades.....

Belgian UN troops admit to roasting a Somali boy

The CIA's coup in Libya is all about stealing oil and CHINA/INDIA policies.........

And helping the arms trade and Wall Street.

And removing Chinese influence.

And giving the USA control of North Africa.

On 9 March 2011,at Global Research, Professor Michel Chossudovsky has an article entitled "Operation Libya" and the Battle for Oil: Redrawing the Map of Africa

Among the points made:

1. Libya has the largest oil reserves in Africa.

The idea behind the US-NATO coup is to control that oil.

And take over Libya's National Oil Corporation.

2. And help the weapons producers.

3. And remove Chinese influence.

China plays a central role in the Libyan oil industry.

The UK's Clegg and Cameron seem to support the CIA coups.

4. And help Wall Street.

Billions of dollars of Libyan financial assets, deposited in Western banks, are to be conficated.

5. And give the USA control of North Africa.

This means weakening French links to Tunisia, Morocco and Algeria; and other parts of Africa such as Niger and Chad.

And weakening Italian links to Libya.

Victims of the Belgians

How do Europeans behave in Africa?

A Belgian officer described a raid to punish a Congolese village that had protested against Belgian actions.

The white officer in command: "ordered us to cut off the heads of the men and hang them on the village palisades, also their sexual members, and to hang the women and the children on the palisade in the form of a cross." (Mass crimes against humanity in the Congo Free State)

It's not Libya that has murdered up to two million Iraqis.

Gaddafi wants an international fact-finding team to visit Libya to investigate alleged atrocities committed during the present troubles, as well as those of the last 42 years of Terror by Kaddafi. (Tripoli calls for atrocities inquiry)

Sources:

Facts on Libya: Oil and Gas, International Energy Agency, 21 February 2011http://www.iea.org/files/facts_libya.pdf

"Oddball banker's friendship with Gaddafi's son is remarkable," by Ephraim Hardcastle, Daily Mail Online, 24 February 2011http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1360082/Gaddafis-sons-friendship-oddball-banker-Nat-Rothschild-remarkable.html#ixzz1ErpryPIE

"Allen Stanford: A Libyan Connection?" by Matthew Goldstein, Business Week, 30 March 2009http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/mar2009/db20090330_170109.htm

"Stanford International Bank became a new BCCI," Geofinancial.blogspot.com, 25 July 2010http://geofinancial.blogspot.com/2010/07/stanford-international-bank-became-new.html

"Libya's oil money has made it major world shareholder", The Guardian, 21 February 2011http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/21/libya-oil-money-major-world-shareholder


....

Orly Weinerman, Jewish friend of Gaddafi's son

Why has the UK been unlucky with its 'spooks' in Libya?

Does Gaddafi have powerful friends?

Germany has blocked plans for a Libya no-fly zone (Guardian)

Gaddafi's son Saif seems to have a number of Jewish friends.

"Saif al-Islam ... is best mates with Israel’s far, far-right settler foreign minister, the fascist Avigdor Lieberman, and was (and perhaps still is) 'romantically involved' with an Israeli actress, Orly Weinerman."

(Clearing up myths and misconceptions about Gaddafi and the Libyan ...‎)

Lord Rothschild and Lord Mandelson

"Lord Mandelson has links to the Libyan regime.

"He has rubbed shoulders with Saif Gaddafi at a shooting party hosted by Lord Rothschild in Buckinghamshire." (Libya: Gaddafi's son asks for Tony Blair's help to 'crush enemies'‎)

JP Morgan has important business interests in Libya. (Libya: Gaddafi's son asks for Tony Blair's help to 'crush enemies'‎)

And Gaddafi is an asset of the CIA/MOSSAD Killers for decades.....

"One of the more serious charges against Gaddafi is that he is a sponsor of terrorism.

"What is less well known is that arms and explosives which the Libyan leader distributed were provided by a CIA agent named Edwin Wilson.

"And that at least some of the terror operations were in fact the false-flag operations of Western intelligence services." (Moammar Gaddafi, Socialist Revolutionary Or Charlatan?‎)

Gaddafi's son Saif al-Islam claims Libya helped finance Nicolas Sarkozy's successful re-election campaign in 2007.

(Sarkozy election campaign was funded by Libya, claims Gaddafi's son‎)

Sarkozy: CIA AGENTS

Aboaoba (Abu Obah), from Manchester in the UK, who was captured in Zawiyah in Libya.

On 16 March 2011, we read about Salah Mohammed Ali Aboaoba, the Libyan rebel 'Al Qaeda fighter' from Britain

On 15 March 2011, in Libya, Aboaoba was presented to the world's media.

Reportedly, Aboaobahe has been helping 'Al Qaeda' fuel unrest in Libya.

Aboaoba says he is a member of the al-Qaeda-linked Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.

Aboaoba claims he raised money for this group at the Didsbury Mosque in Manchester, in the UK.

Aboaoba says he moved from Yemen to Britain in 2005.

He says he was granted asylum in the UK and lives with his family in Manchester.

He travelled to Libya in 2010.

Is he a British spook?

Mr Smith

On 13th March 2011, we read about 'Tom Smith' our man on the Libyan farm.

Welshman 'Tom Smith' has been working as the manager of a 'Farmco' wheat farm in Libya.

Farmco is a joint initiative between the Libyan government and American companies.

'Tom Smith' is thought to be an MI6 agent.

One night recently, 'Tom Smith' met two Chinook helicopters which had brought seven SAS men, a mid-ranking spook, and lots of guns, ammunition and explosives.

Smith and the new arrivals were arrested.

At the farm, Smith's workers found a locked room containing maps and white-boards full of military statistics.

Smith had previously worked with the British military in Basra in southern Iraq.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbvz2mTUDWA&feature=player_embedded